I. Introduction: Genetically Modified Foods (GMF)
Pictures pending!
II. Discovery: Mutating DNA
According to Campden and Chorleywood Food Research Association (CCFRA),
“genes change every day by natural mutation and recombination creating new biological combinations” (CCFRA 2010). DNA is not, nor ever will be, “static”. As long as we can modify it, genetic alterations, mutations, and recombinations will occur. In the case of GM foods, rather than change occurring naturally, it is forced to alter through controlled and deliberate means usually through chemical changes or via radiation. Characteristics and elements that seem to yield beneficial results such as chymosin of bovines can be transferred to industrial microorganisms and produced commercially as yeast rather than yeast obtained from the remnants of animal carcasses once used in cheese production.
III. Benefits/Consequences
IV. Impact on the World/Humanity
There is no doubt that GMF are here to stay, Supermarket shelves are full of processed and altered foods catering to nearly every segment of the population. Although they have been subjected to rigorous safety assessments, there needs to obviously be more since these altered foods are playing with our chemically and genetic compositions.
Some will continue to argue that it is easy to forget that DNA is, and always has been, part of our daily diet and that it naturally changes every day. Daily, each of us consumes millions of copies of many thousands of genes, most of whom we do not know what they do to our bodies. Seriously, how many people stop to think about the genes of tomato, cucumber, and lettuce in a salad, the bovine genes in a beef steak, the fragmented DNA in many processed foods, and the genes of the many micro-organisms that we breathe and swallow? Answer? Not many. When chomping on that cheeseburger, does anyone think about how it might make them insulin resistant or make the usual antibiotics unable to fight infectious viruses like MRSA?
V. Journal Article Review
Genetically Modified Foods as published in The Science Journal and posted to Penn State’s Eberly School of Science website, was written by Dr. Nina Federoff and suggests that one of the primary benefits of GMF is that fewer people need to farm and more people can pursue their passions because they are not tied to the responsibilities of food production. She claims, that in fact, our society as a whole is richer because we use GMFs. Federoff further suggests that it is within our natures to alter nature; to preserve and adapt plant material for survival.
Having worked with such scientists as the Nobel Laureate Barbara McClintock of “transposons” or “jumping genes”, Federoff was able to map and analyze the gene recognizing the moveable quality of genes to chromosomes. As somewhat of a pioneer in the field of corn transposons, Federoff was instrumental in developing the first few waves of GM maize. She contends that since man has been monkeying with evolution since the dawn of man walking upright, that GM is a natural extension of man’s tendency to develop better methods of feeding and that many of the foods we have come to love have been the product of crossbreeding or GM. As author of the book, Mendel in the Kitchen: A Scientist’s View of Genetically Modified Food, she shares her concern about industry standards and governmental regulations only focusing on plants that have undergone molecular modifications (sugar for example) as opposed to examining all lab manufactured products.
She also highlights how other important contributions to the world of feeding an ever-growing population by suggesting that the “Haber-Bosch process for converting the gaseous nitrogen in the air to a form that plants can use as nitrogen fertilizer. Second was the observation of George Harrison Shull that intercrossing inbred corn varieties produces robust and productive offspring. This is the scientific underpinning of the entire hybrid corn industry” (Federoff 2007). Continued work in the field, especially with regard to radiation and chemical alterations is necessary if politics and economics cannot resolve the issues with food deployment.
Works Cited
Bourzac, Katherine. "Transgenic Worms Make Tough Fibers - Technology Review." Technology Review: The Authority on the Future of Technology. MIT, 27 Oct. 2010. Web. 13 Feb. 2011. <http://www.technologyreview.com/biomedicine/26623/>.
Engel, Karl, Gary R. Takeoka, and Roy Teranishi. Genetically modified foods: safety issues : developed from a symposium sponsored by the Division of Agricultural and Food Chemistry at the 208th National Meeting of the American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, August 21-25, 1994. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society, 1995. Print.
Ewen, Dr Stanley W B . "Effect of diets containing genetically modified potatoes expressing Galanthus nivalis lectin on rat small intestine." Vivat Academia 354.9187 (199): 100-112. Print.
Federoff, Nina. "Genetically Modified Foods." Science Journal 26 (2007): 1-5. Print.
Jones, Leighton. "Genetically Modified Foods." British Medical Journal 318.7183 (1999): 611- 613. Print.
"USA: Cultivation of GM plants, 2009." GMO COMPASS - Information on genetically modified organisms. N.p., n.d. Web. 13 Feb. 2011. <http://www.gmo- compass.org/eng/agri_biotechnology/gmo_planting/506.usa_cultivation_gm_plants.
No comments:
Post a Comment